Based on a focus on identity/becoming, this research questions Donna Haraway's claims about companion animal in ethical actions, refuting human-dominated kinship between humans and animals. In order to make the argument, the research requires the move that brings in works on biocentric (Lemm: 2009; Norris: 1985), new materialism (Bennett, 2010; Barad: 2007; 2015; Coole and Frost :2010; Braidotti: 2013; Elizabeth Grosz: 2004), and queer identity studies (Butler: 1990；Engebretsen: 2014; Barad: 2015; Preciado: 2013), and poststructuralist conceptions of animal (Deleuze and Guattari: 1980; Derrida：2002). My hypothesis is that by problematizing the norms, subjectivity and standards of race, gender, and intimacy in mainstream Chinese society, analyzing an analogous mapping between these descriptions with the human's desire to categorize and control of animals (within imagined, lived or taxonomic intimacies), asking what lives are deemed visible in institutional spaces under the control of biopolicies, imaging a radically different approach to queer identity which as being a fluid corporeality emerging: one that becoming animal (Deleuze and Guattari: 1980), animacy (Chen: 2012), and entanglement (Barad: 2007). My intention of applying is to provide alternative perspectives through the lens of the other : the monster, the pet, the partner; an alternative perspective that is apart from the conventional viewpoint that otherness and stigmatization.